By Stephanie Mayer

In 2012, there was research published that has shown eye blinks correlate to the space between sentences and breaks that allow the brain to absorb information. Through this research when analyzing the brain activity, blinking plays a role in adjusting focus and aiding concentration.

This presentation will absorb the connection between “blinking” and focus related to the use of technology when learning. Activities will include different live demonstrations with focus and concentration in blinking. Topics will include focus, concentration, technology in classrooms vs text in classrooms and confidence in the ability to learn with technology. Outcomes will include the importance of blinking in the ability to retain information. As well as show how the attractiveness of technology allows the eye to separate information through “blinks.”

Why: Blinking is a process our brain will do without thought or force. The main cause for blinking is to hydrate our eyes, but it goes way beyond just hydration. Blinking allows for a physical connection in digesting information. This form of connection will show a physical separation of ideas and thought processes. By blinking, the brain is registering and organizing information through each blink.

Examples of Study through Experiment:
Throughout my own personal research I have found that students of all ages have this connection in retaining information through blinking. In an experiment with 15 Union County College students, participants were tested on retaining information based off unintentional and intentional blinking. Participants were tested on comprehension of physical passages and passages via technology. They were tested on a passage of reading without focus on blinking and then a separate passage – focused on blinking. Results have shown a higher accuracy of comprehension of the material when blinking was the focus.

Text vs Technology:
Further results of this experiment have also shown participants paid more attention of the passage assigned on technology rather than the physical passage. The score gap from the physical passage of unintentional to intentional blinking was larger compared to technological testing.  Studying more into why, was proven (through survey) that our eyes have more connection on movement and being able to customize the visual image to our own comfort. Physical text forces this “one size fits all,” where technology allows a “pick your size that best fits” method. With creating your own comfort to visually see information, our eyes feel more comfort and our blinking becomes more unintentional – creating a more fluid environment in comprehending information.

Live Demonstrations: Live demonstrations will include participating from the audience in similar tests presented through listed experiment.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Concurrent

The Social Network of Early English Drama: A Digital Humanities Lesson Plan

By Adam Rzepka The Folger Shakespeare Library’s recently launched Digital Anthology of Early Modern English Drama (DA) provides searchable, encoded, digital editions of 403 English plays first staged in London between1576 and 1642. A central Read more…

Presentation

A Multimodal Digital Approach to Qualitative Research

By Jennifer Kingma Wall This Spark session will briefly overview the concept of Creative Analytic Practices (CAP) (Richardson, 2000) as a qualitative research method, and will explain how integrating digital technology through a multimodal digital Read more…

Concurrent

Innovative Project Based Teaching and Learning Experiences Infusing Literacy

By Jennifer Pankowski and Sharon Medow This collaborative presentation will highlight projects infused in undergraduate and graduate education courses centered in the area of literacy and blended with the humanities, the arts and technology. These projects Read more…