Presented by: Michael Bieber

Participatory Learning (PL) creates learning opportunities, increases student motivation for learning, and deepens learning through active participation in the entire Problem Lifecycle for assignments, quizzes and other kinds of activities.  Traditionally, students only solve problems assigned by the instructor.  However, by actively engaging students in every Lifecycle stage (including crafting problems for peers, providing solutions, peer grading, and disputes involving self-assessment), students are motivated to achieve higher learning outcomes. Experimental results will be presented along with really interesting issues arising from usability and pilot experiments, such as motivating students, assessing actual learning, learning to design and use rubrics, anonymity within online systems, trusting peers, contingency planning when students don’t participate, and what it takes for instructors to embrace the approach.

This research is transformative.  It combines various successful teaching approaches into a single framework and process.  It brings a new approach to engaging and motivating students, and deepen their learning across course modes.  We believe it will work in most types of courses including across the STEM fields; and possibly from junior high school through graduate education.   It may solve some issues of engaging students within MOOCs (massive open online courses).  The assessment and team work inherent within PL’s framework could enhance student’s interpersonal (soft) skills, better preparing them for the workplace.  The deeper learning and motivation PL brings, even to topics that students previously have chosen to disengage with, may increase retention and articulation rates.

Participatory Learning is supported by an on-line prototype infrastructure that facilitates the problem lifecycle tasks, underlying processes or “workflow” management, instructor activities and oversight, and ensuring anonymity throughout student interaction.   Future extensions include group support, commenting and flagging, rating, and teaching students how to do their tasks (calibration).  Further information may be found at

Keywords: assessment, evidence of impact, learner-centered


Categories: PresentationSparks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts


The Social Network of Early English Drama: A Digital Humanities Lesson Plan

By Adam Rzepka The Folger Shakespeare Library’s recently launched Digital Anthology of Early Modern English Drama (DA) provides searchable, encoded, digital editions of 403 English plays first staged in London between1576 and 1642. A central Read more…


A Multimodal Digital Approach to Qualitative Research

By Jennifer Kingma Wall This Spark session will briefly overview the concept of Creative Analytic Practices (CAP) (Richardson, 2000) as a qualitative research method, and will explain how integrating digital technology through a multimodal digital Read more…


Innovative Project Based Teaching and Learning Experiences Infusing Literacy

By Jennifer Pankowski and Sharon Medow This collaborative presentation will highlight projects infused in undergraduate and graduate education courses centered in the area of literacy and blended with the humanities, the arts and technology. These projects Read more…

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial